Skip to main content

Motor

AMI Motor Insurance Agent Standard

Version: 0.2 (Draft for Comment)
Status: Working Draft.
Steward: Marrow (onmarrow.com), on behalf of the Agent Mediated Insurance (AMI) working group
Line of business: UK private motor
Published: June 2026

This is a draft request for comment. It defines how an autonomous AI agent should request, compare, and transact a UK private motor insurance quote against a regulated carrier, in a way that is safe, auditable, and carrier-agnostic. It is published openly so that carriers, agent platforms, and regulators can converge on a single shape rather than a hundred bespoke integrations. Comments to standards@onmarrow.com.

Foundational dependency. This standard relies on the AMI Core Patterns Standard for all shared behavioural rules (grounding and no fabrication, assume-infer-confirm, the advice-versus-information boundary, disclose-and-acknowledge, fair presentation, honest absence and uncertainty, data protection, vulnerability and Consumer Duty, handover machinery, and audit) and the canonical roles, and on the AMI Consent, Authority and Scopes Standard for authentication and transaction authority. Only the rules distinctive to motor are stated in full below.


Sources and provenance

This draft is validated against the following. Where a field or rule below cites a basis, it refers to this list.

  • Polaris UK is the digital trading standards body for UK general insurance. Its Polaris Online Database (POD) publishes the EDI, XML, and JSON message definitions and the industry code lists for personal and commercial lines. The XML and JSON standards support both quotation and placement. The canonical motor schema in this standard should align to Polaris code lists field-for-field; see the confidence note below on what that requires.
  • MyLicence (IIADD) is the Insurance Industry Access to Driver Data database, reached via the MIB Hub's secure link to DVLA licence data. Given a 16-character driving licence number, it returns licence type, entitlement, endorsement codes, penalty points, disqualifications, and licence duration. It is the authoritative source for the driver-history fields.
  • CUE (Claims and Underwriting Exchange), managed by Insurance Database Services Limited under the MIB, holds UK claims records and is checked at quote to verify claims history.
  • MIAFTR (Motor Insurance Anti-Fraud and Theft Register), MIB-managed, records written-off and stolen vehicles; checked against the registration.
  • MID (Motor Insurance Database), MIB-managed, is the record of insured vehicles.
  • DVLA vehicle data resolves specification, and DVLA offence codes are the canonical representation of motoring convictions.
  • An industry-standard product-data source provides the canonical cover-feature taxonomy for like-for-like policy comparison. The canonical cover-feature taxonomy in the quote response should map to this feature set.
  • UK aggregator and insurer question sets (Confused.com, Compare the Market, Aviva, Admiral, NFU Mutual and others) corroborate the customer-facing field list and the social/commuting/business class-of-use conventions.


1. Why this standard exists

An AI agent can already talk about insurance. It cannot reliably buy it. The reason is not model capability. It is that there is no agreed, machine-readable contract for what an agent must establish, what a carrier must return, and what neither side is permitted to do. Without that contract, every agent-to-carrier connection is hand-built, every carrier behaves differently, and the agent is one hallucinated premium away from a regulatory breach.

This standard fixes the contract for one line of business: the canonical quote request, the enrichment that populates it, the canonical response, and the behavioural rules that keep the agent inside UK regulatory expectations (FCA Consumer Duty, the advice-versus-information boundary, fair presentation). A carrier that exposes motor through this shape, and an agent that consumes it, interoperate without bespoke work, and a regulator can read one document to understand how the transaction is governed.


2. Design principles

The shared design principles (carrier-agnostic by construction; look up, do not ask; no fabrication; assume-infer-confirm; disclose-and-acknowledge; observable compliance) are defined in the AMI Core Patterns Standard and apply in full. Motor is the exemplar of look up, do not ask: the registration and the licence number key almost the entire risk picture, so the agent retrieves and confirms rather than interrogating.


Live demo

The same protocol, walked through interactively. The left panel is the agent's conversation; the right is the canonical motor_quote_request building up, every value tagged with its provenance: enriched, attested, derived, or asked. The Bind & pay action stays locked until all six conditions of the bind precondition invariant (defined in the New Business Standards) are met. Step through it:


3. Roles and terms

Roles and terms (Customer, Agent, Surface, Rail, Carrier, Material fact) are defined in the AMI Core Patterns Standard. No motor-specific roles are added.


4. Canonical motor quote request

The agent assembles a motor_quote_request. Fields are marked enrichable (the rail can populate from an authoritative source; the customer still confirms), required (must be present or confirmed before a quote call), or conditional.

4.1 Identifiers (enrichment keys)

FieldTypeNotes
vehicle_registrationenrichable keyResolves the entire vehicle block via DVLA and vehicle data, and keys MIAFTR. Prefer this over asking the customer to describe the vehicle.
driving_licence_numberenrichable key16-character DLN. Keys MyLicence/IIADD, which returns entitlement, endorsements, penalty points, disqualifications, and licence duration. Captured per driver. Basis: MyLicence.
national_insurance_numberconditionalWhere a carrier requires it for identity or NCD verification. PII; tokenised by the rail.

4.2 Proposer and drivers

An array of one or more drivers; the proposer is flagged. Per driver:

FieldRequiredBasis / notes
date_of_birthrequiredRating and eligibility.
relationship_to_proposerrequired
occupation and employment_statusrequiredPolaris occupation code list. Full-time, part-time, self-employed, plus occupation and employer where relevant.
licence_typeenrichableFrom MyLicence; confirmed by customer.
licence_held_years / test_pass_dateenrichableFrom MyLicence. Replaces asking the customer.
entitlementenrichableFrom MyLicence.
convictionsenrichableFrom MyLicence where available; each as DVLA offence code, date, points, and alcohol or accident involvement. Default empty, confirmed not assumed. Basis: MyLicence, DVLA offence codes.
medical_conditions_dvla_notifiablerequiredBoolean attestation, not detail.
homeowner_statusrequiredStandard rating factor.
uk_residency_sincerequiredStandard rating factor.
claims_historyenrichablePer driver, five-year. From CUE, confirmed by customer; each claim with date, type, fault status, cost band. Basis: CUE.
access_to_other_vehiclesoptionalRating factor.

4.3 Household

FieldRequiredNotes
household_members_who_may_driverequiredAll resident members who may drive, listed or explicitly excluded. Addresses fronting and undisclosed-driver risk.

4.4 Vehicle (enriched from vehicle_registration)

FieldRequiredBasis / notes
make / model / variant / year / fuel / engineenrichableDVLA and vehicle data.
abi_code / insurance_groupenrichableRating keys; from vehicle data.
valueenrichableConfirmed by customer.
modificationsrequiredExplicit attestation; material non-disclosure risk. Default null, never silently assumed absent.
securityrequiredAlarm, immobiliser, tracker. Rating factor.
ownership and registered_keeperrequiredOwner, registered keeper, or neither.
keeper_since / purchase_dateoptional
import_statusconditionalImported or grey import affects rating and eligibility.
overnight_locationrequiredGarage, driveway, street, car park. Defaults to proposer postcode garaging, confirmed.
daytime_locationoptionalWhere different from overnight.
write_off_theft_flagenrichableFrom MIAFTR; surfaced if the vehicle has a recorded write-off or theft marker. Basis: MIAFTR.

4.5 Usage

FieldRequiredNotes
class_of_userequiredSocial and domestic only; plus commuting; plus business. Aggregator-standard conventions.
annual_mileagerequired
commute_destinationconditionalRequired when class includes commuting.

4.6 Cover

FieldRequiredNotes
cover_typerequiredComprehensive, third party fire and theft, third party only.
voluntary_excessrequired
ncd_yearsrequiredNo-claims discount; subject to proof at bind.
claim_free_years_as_main_driverrequiredDistinct from NCD years; do not conflate.
cover_start_daterequired
payment_frequencyrequiredAnnual or monthly; monthly implies a credit agreement with its own disclosure.
telematics_opt_inoptionalWhether a telematics or black-box product is acceptable.
addonsoptionalCanonical list: breakdown, legal expenses, courtesy car, protected NCD.

4.7 Declarations (history and anti-fraud)

FieldRequiredBasis / notes
previous_insurance_refused_cancelled_voidedrequiredEver refused, cancelled, voided, or accepted on special terms. Material, permanent record, high non-disclosure risk. A material, permanent record; high non-disclosure risk.
named_driver_exclusionsoptionalAny household member explicitly excluded.

5. Enrichment and verification hooks

The rail performs these between request assembly and the carrier call. Results are returned to the agent for customer confirmation, never used silently in a way the customer has not seen. Verification hooks (CUE, MIAFTR, MID) may also run as carrier-side checks at or after quote.

HookSourcePopulates / checksBasis
vehicle_lookupDVLA + vehicle dataSpecification, ABI code, insurance group, value from registration.DVLA
licence_lookupMyLicence / IIADD via MIB HubLicence type, entitlement, endorsements, points, disqualifications, licence duration, test pass date.MyLicence
claims_checkCUE (IDSL / MIB)Verifies and pre-fills claims history.CUE
vehicle_theft_writeoff_checkMIAFTR (MIB)Write-off or theft markers on the vehicle.MIAFTR
insured_status_checkMID (MIB)Existing insured status.MID
postcode_riskPostcode metadataFlood zone, crime band, area rating context.Aggregator convention
address_verifyAddress lookupGaraging address normalisation.-

A carrier may override any enrichment source with its own preferred vendor; the canonical field names do not change.


6. Canonical motor quote response

The carrier (via the rail) returns a motor_quote_response containing zero or more quote objects. Zero quotes is a valid, first-class response meaning no appetite, and the agent must represent it honestly.

Each quote object:

FieldNotes
carrier_quote_referenceRequired for bind.
annual_premium / monthly_premiumAs returned. The agent must not recompute or independently annualise. Where monthly, the credit agreement and APR are disclosed.
cover_typeEcho of the rated cover.
compulsory_excess / voluntary_excess
cover_featuresStructured against an industry-standard feature taxonomy, so cover can be compared like-for-like across carriers rather than on price alone.
key_exclusionsStructured list; surfaced under disclose-and-acknowledge.
priced_addonsEach add-on priced separately; never bundled silently.
ipid_urlInsurance Product Information Document.
validity_expires_atQuote expiry; an expired quote must not be presented as live.
appetite_statusquoted, declined, or referred. A referral routes to human handover.

7. Agent behavioural rules (compliance semantics)

The general behavioural rules (no fabrication, information-not-advice, material-fact confirmation, disclose-and-acknowledge, PII minimisation, fair presentation across carriers, honest absence) are defined in Core Patterns Section 3 and apply in full. Motor-specific emphasis:

  1. Material facts attested before bind: modifications, convictions, claims, class of use, garaging, household drivers, and the previous-insurance-refused-cancelled-voided declaration.
  2. Identifier tokenisation: the driving licence number and National Insurance number are tokenised by the rail before they reach model context or logs.
  3. Monthly-payment disclosure: where premium is paid monthly, the credit agreement and APR are disclosed under disclose-and-acknowledge.

8. Handover triggers

The shared handover machinery and common triggers are defined in Core Patterns Section 3.9. Motor-specific triggers, additional to those: a MIAFTR or CUE flag requiring underwriter review; an unresolved conflict between an enriched value (for example MyLicence) and a customer attestation; or a complex claims, conviction, or previous-refusal profile the canonical schema cannot represent.


9. Audit requirements

Audit requirements are defined in Core Patterns Section 3.10 and apply in full. Motor-specific evidentiary emphasis: the enrichment and verification calls (DVLA, MyLicence, CUE, MIAFTR, MID) and their results, and each material field marked as enriched or attested.


10. Versioning and conformance

This standard is versioned (v0.2) and relies on the AMI Core Patterns Standard and the AMI Consent, Authority and Scopes Standard; conformance requires conformance to those at a declared version. A conformant agent implements Sections 4 through 9 in full. A conformant carrier maps its motor product to the canonical request and response and supplies the IPID and appetite semantics. Partial implementations declare which sections they omit. A future version follows Polaris POD access and will move the standard from alignment with the UK motor data standard to conformance with it.


11. Open questions for comment

  • Locking the canonical occupation, modification, conviction, and cover-feature code lists against Polaris POD and an industry-standard product-data source.
  • Whether ncd_years proof should be pre-bind or post-bind in the canonical flow.
  • The minimum claims and convictions lookback the standard should mandate versus leave to carrier appetite.
  • How advised sales should be represented when an agent operates under a permission to advise.
  • Multi-carrier ordering disclosure: the minimum the standard should require an agent to tell the customer.

Become a contributor


Published as an open standard. Marrow stewards the drafting but does not assert proprietary control over the interface; the compliance, enrichment, and audit implementations behind it are separate. Carriers, agent platforms, and regulators are invited to adopt, critique, and co-author future versions.